Can I just say that I don't consider 'all' re-mixes to be flawed. In simple terms, all alternative mixes since Republic have been goose scraps.
Dates
· UTC
Official Krafty Release Day Thread
Archived198 replies · 3,622 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Digital Republic
Showing posts 91–120 of 199
↑ First post
Latest post ↓
Surely it's no accident that Glimmers is track #1. In some ways I prefer it to the NO version.
Huntsman wrote:
Patrick wrote: Who is Adrian Lima?
I haven't seen that film P - is it also flawed?
If it's a film it must be flawed, H.
depthcharge wrote: Just did a bit of intense research on Lima and she looks flawed in two significent departments. First, I can't find any evidence that she's a New Order fan. Second, I'd posit that she's a little el stupido.
:\pimp3:
Objection! Speculative?
depthcharge wrote: This thread has gone to the dogs. No one countered my God Almighty theory either.
:\pimp3:
Are tracks 3 and 4 mislabeled?
Charger. I can't read your reply to my objection. There seems to be a flaw in the mechanism.
depthcharge wrote: This thread has gone to the dogs. No one countered my God Almighty theory either.
:\pimp3:
Truth denied; I answered. Your response is imminent:
'Surely there is only one true God'? and he (who lives on a decent sized cloud wearing a beard) by default is totally flawless (totally is required).
Hank Wiseass© wrote: Charger. I can't read your reply to my objection. There seems to be a flaw in the mechanism.
I have a theory that mechanisms are like films.
Hank Wiseass© wrote: Objection! Speculative?
Speculative for sure but unless you can prove otherwise - flawed!
The other obvious flaw is how are you going to tell your mates you just, excuse me Huntsy, whacked off to someone called Adrian?
:\pimp3:
Patrick wrote:
Hank Wiseass© wrote: Charger. I can't read your reply to my objection. There seems to be a flaw in the mechanism.
I have a theory that mechanisms are like films.
That was a film about a flawed mechanism.
But ... the film was flawless (surely).
depthcharge wrote:
Hank Wiseass© wrote: Objection! Speculative?
Speculative for sure but unless you can prove otherwise - flawed!
The other obvious flaw is how are you going to tell your mates you just, excuse me Huntsy, whacked off to someone called Adrian?
:\pimp3:
Eh? You're missing an 'a'. Defence rests.
Hank Wiseass© wrote: I believe Adrian Lima to be flawless.
Case closed your honour.
:\pimp3:
Patrick wrote: It's not the job and it's not the place. . .
Good lord that's a bit cryptic.
Is that another of your flawed theories?
depthcharge wrote:
Hank Wiseass© wrote: I believe Adrian Lima to be flawless.
Case closed your honour.
:\pimp3:
I never said I was flawless.
Huntsman wrote:
Patrick wrote: It's not the job and it's not the place. . .
Good lord that's a bit cryptic.
Is that another of your flawed theories?
Additional flawless lyrics about mango mama.
You'd have to surmise that he is infering a galmorous sailing boat, as opposed to a gunship grey vessel of the seven seas.
I do love them Sirens when they call.
Adrian Lima looks a bit weird to me. definitely not flawless.
Surely if a bird was flawless she wouldn't necessarily be that attractive - and quite possibly boring. Isn't the flaws in women that make them attractive to us? I may of course be speaking out of my arse mind you.
how about those Mars delight things. Without wanting to sound like a woman, they're pretty much perfect
Huntsman wrote: You'd have to surmise that he is infering a galmorous sailing boat, as opposed to a gunship grey vessel of the seven seas.
Perhaps then it's the same one he took on a summer cruise, on an ocean born to lose?
:\pimp3:
