Biznotic Love Trapezoid wrote:
DC wrote:
I marginally prefer the 7" original - more power blah, blah, as everyone has said. The rerecording is still fantastic though, lots of space in the production, maybe a touch too much? Everything seems a little bit further away. My favourite version is Blackpool 1980, with Steve on vocals. Wonderful!
Despite being an old fart who was there at the time, I do not share the reverence for the orig Temptation over the 87 version. The orig is a bit clanky for me - there are moments when everything feels too tinny. But you know, both are great really, so what does it matter?
Hey Biz, you post on ILM, don't you?
yes, i post at ILM. What's your user name there?
Your post illustrates my feeling about authenticity and an unspoken 'rule' amongst fans of most bands; ie. the closest performance to the original performance is almost always touted as being the best. You state the Blackpool 80 version with Steve on vocals is your 'favorite'. While i find that version intersting, i also find it impossible to come back to because of it's awful sound quality. I cannot have a 'favorite' version of a song that i can't listen to on a regular basis. 10 times out of 10, i'll put the 7" Ceremony on a mix, because i find it the most interesting mix of the track.
Good point about Temptation. I actually haven't played the 87 version for ages. I love the rawness of the 82 7/12" versions and also love the short and sweet 98 rerecording. The point is, i really haven't heard a version of Temptation done by New Order that i dislike. I can't say the 87 mix is awful and ruins that track, even if i prefer the other mixes. It simply isn't true. I think folks are being dishonest when they say New Order stripped the track of it's feeling in 87.
Biz - I'm Dr. C on ILM.
I should have said that Blackpool 80 was my favourite live version of Ceremony, not fave version per se. I love Steve's vox, the Joy-Div style attack of Barney's guitar and I prefer Hooky's slightly cleaner tone that he used to use on earlier live versions. It probably is closer to the 7" in sound. Interesting that they introduce it as 'our new single' when they hadn't even settled on a singer yet.
I don't disagree with yout thoughts on authenticism.