Skip to content

New Order reissues - official tracklisting

Archived

383 replies · 56,426 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

greeneyes1 wrote: These aren't out yet in the US, but I have a hard time thinking that Rhino (in the US) would release them with such glaring defects. Could it be the delayed US release was to fix things up?

we can only hope..

someone should contact someone there, and give them a heads up....

maybe even someone from this board, that has contacts there...

later -1

0 likes

greeneyes1 wrote: Do the credits for the re-issues indicate who did the remastering?

The Joy Division re-issues credit Jon Davis at Alchemy : http://www.alchemysoho.com/html/alchemy.php?sp=engineer1a

nope,

probably too embarassed, or maybe they're too busy getting fired or laid off for the bad job on the bonus discs...

later -1

0 likes

MrDisco wrote: I now have PCL Lowlife and Brotherhood. The other two are on the way.

One disappointment so far for me is on the bonus disc with Brotherhood. the version of 'True Dub' I was expecting the flipside of the Shep Pettibone remix

Instead we get a nondescript dance mix which bares no relation to 'True Faith' except for a sampled line "I feel so extraordinary" repeated over and over.

I also have Brotherhood, and this track made me want to punt it across the room. Whatever half arsed assembly of these bonus tracks occured, it's obvious they didnt care for much of the fans interest, or common sense.

0 likes

-1 wrote:

thats no excuse...

but all of sudden when it comes to 'new order', everybody starts acting like we're being robbed, ripped off, and given the a rush job.....what else is new? it's ALWAYS been like that, since the mess that was 'substance'...there's no reason to expect it to have gotten it better, so why expect/demand it now? -1

I beg your pardon? Substance was a mess was it? No one gave a fuck back then. I don't remember too many complaints in NME letters pages moaning about edits to this and that and C & W being called Mesh. Not one of my mates Substance was and still is a fucking great product, and so were all of their Factory output. FWIW, I don't like the reissues and I will not buy them - What's the point moaning about them. You have all the tracks so who gives a shit that they don't appear on the reissues?

0 likes

maybe you didn't care about 'substance' back then..

but if substance was a decent product back then..

we wouldn't have to wait 20+ years for the full version of 'the perfect kiss', or 'temptation', or 'confusion', 'hurt', etc, etc...

looks like we're still waiting..

substance was a terrible compilation, that could have been fixed easily, but they didn't take the time to do it right on cd..

the cassette versions were excellent though.. (especially the limited edition ones from factory)..

later -1

0 likes

So any news of the new releases?Bit slow round Chorley.Anyone got any photos of the plastic sleeves.I just LOVE that to protect the CD.

0 likes

Solitude wrote:

-1 wrote:

thats no excuse...

but all of sudden when it comes to 'new order', everybody starts acting like we're being robbed, ripped off, and given the a rush job.....what else is new? it's ALWAYS been like that, since the mess that was 'substance'...there's no reason to expect it to have gotten it better, so why expect/demand it now? -1

I beg your pardon? Substance was a mess was it? No one gave a fuck back then. I don't remember too many complaints in NME letters pages moaning about edits to this and that and C & W being called Mesh. Not one of my mates Substance was and still is a fucking great product, and so were all of their Factory output. FWIW, I don't like the reissues and I will not buy them - What's the point moaning about them. You have all the tracks so who gives a shit that they don't appear on the reissues?

I'll tell you why it is important to 'moan' about them: If no one complains about the lack of quality that occurred than the record companies can do anything they want in these cases, they can get away with Murder (which they DID actually on the bonus disc of P,C&L:D). This is the case by any CD that's released by any record company: double check it first before you throw it into the market!

0 likes

Does anybody know anything about the Substance Collectors Edition which is on play.com and says it's coming soon. I ask because one of my substance discs is fecked and i was thinking of buying it new again and avoiding these remasters.

0 likes

-1 wrote: maybe you didn't care about 'substance' back then..

but if substance was a decent product back then..

we wouldn't have to wait 20+ years for the full version of 'the perfect kiss', or 'temptation', or 'confusion', 'hurt', etc, etc...

looks like we're still waiting..

substance was a terrible compilation, that could have been fixed easily, but they didn't take the time to do it right on cd..

the cassette versions were excellent though.. (especially the limited edition ones from factory)..

later -1

Substance was a fine product. They made the decision at the time to redo Confusion and Temptation so they could add something new and they were not satisfied with the originals. They shortened Perfect Kiss to make room on the CD I guess, poor decision. Sure, I would have made a few different decisions like have both C&W and Mesh, a different version of Confusion on disc 2, and why the hell would you need Shame of the Nation. They were limited by the space on the 2 discs. This was at the cusp of the CD era, the vinyl releases were not that rare, vinyl was not "obsolete" yet. It was about the "art" of the Factory product, not a complete collection.

0 likes

Neil Monaghan wrote: Does anybody know anything about the Substance Collectors Edition which is on play.com and says it's coming soon. I ask because one of my substance discs is fecked and i was thinking of buying it new again and avoiding these remasters.

I'd be interested also..

0 likes

If nothing else, the remasters HAVE gotten me back into NO in a big way... to the point that I spent (way too much) time compiling the 20 essential singles, in their various compilation forms and edits, on my blog:

http://richpicks.blogspot.com/

Hopefully it's a decent overview. It was definitely a daunting task with all the discrepancies from comp to comp... and I only wish the reissues sounded better, as it would've been handy to have (nearly) all the complete 12" versions available in one spot. My next step will be to rate (slam?) the various compilations... followed by an overview of all the Factory releases, highlighting the essential album (non-single) tracks. As I say in the blog, a quality NO retrospective CAN be compiled... just not by Warner Bros! Any comments/criticisms, please post 'em here or on the blog. Thanks!

--Rich

0 likes

0_o wrote:

-1 wrote: the cassette versions were excellent though.. (especially the limited edition ones from factory)..

later -1

Substance was a fine product. They made the decision at the time to redo Confusion and Temptation so they could add something new and they were not satisfied with the originals. They shortened Perfect Kiss to make room on the CD I guess, poor decision. Sure, I would have made a few different decisions like have both C&W and Mesh, a different version of Confusion on disc 2, and why the hell would you need Shame of the Nation. They were limited by the space on the 2 discs. This was at the cusp of the CD era, the vinyl releases were not that rare, vinyl was not "obsolete" yet. It was about the "art" of the Factory product, not a complete collection.

i'm not really sure by what you mean, it was about being an 'art' product...

it's about the music, period.... who cares about the art? this is a band we're talking about, not some painter, or sculptor..

like i said, the cassette release was excellent..

it's easy to retroactively look back, and forgive all the mistakes on the factory releases, because they came in a 'pretty' package..

but that doesn't excuse them for messing up the track names, editting tracks (unheard of at that time), and sneakily slipping in new versions to disappoint the public...

if enough people had made a point to contact them about their errors, and mistakes, we wouldn't have had their long and terrible decision making process year after year after year, with no one saying anything:

substance - flawed product the best of - uk and us version , both flawed the rest of - some decent tracks, but still flawed international - still a terrible tracklisting, flawed singles - horrible, beyond belief in quality (the tracklisting was ok). retro - of course it was flawed

**YES, these were from/on different labels, that still doesn't excuse them..

and now to top off all this, we get the remasters, because no one bothered to correct them in the first place..

give them an inch.... and they take a mile..

they must not have thought that anyone cared.. and they still don't

later -1

0 likes

Sorry, I've lost track of this thread a bit is there a difinitive list of what song versions are on the bonus discs.

I'm not planning on buying these unless there are tracks I cannot otherwise get on CD.

0 likes

http://richpicks.blogspot.com/

My favorite version of Bizarre Love Triangle is what I believe to be the original 7" version, only available on CD to my knowledge on the Bizarre Love Triangle CD single which also included several other versions of the song along with State of the Nation. Below is full information about the CD:

CD5: US 1994 (Qwest 9 20546-2)

    4:20    Bizarre Love Triangle (album version)
    6:41    Bizarre Love Triangle (extended dance mix)
    7:00    I Don't Care (dub) \*
    6:31    State of the Nation
    3:44    Bizarre Love Triangle (single remix)
0 likes

Aaron Gerritz wrote: http://richpicks.blogspot.com/

My favorite version of Bizarre Love Triangle is what I believe to be the original 7" version, only available on CD to my knowledge on the Bizarre Love Triangle CD single which also included several other versions of the song along with State of the Nation. Below is full information about the CD:

CD5: US 1994 (Qwest 9 20546-2)

    4:20    Bizarre Love Triangle (album version)
    6:41    Bizarre Love Triangle (extended dance mix)
    7:00    I Don't Care (dub) \*
    6:31    State of the Nation
    3:44    Bizarre Love Triangle (single remix)

There's an even better mix of BLT on the "Married to the Mob" soundtrack. It adds an extra vocal melody and ending.

0 likes

There's an even better mix of BLT on the "Married to the Mob" soundtrack. It adds an extra vocal melody and ending.

That's Stephen Hague's version... indeed a better mix!

0 likes

musicoloog wrote:

There's an even better mix of BLT on the "Married to the Mob" soundtrack. It adds an extra vocal melody and ending.

That's Stephen Hague's version... indeed a better mix!

Sounds exactly the same as the '94 version on 'best of' to me, but then the more mixes one hears the more they all become indistinguishable. They also both sound identical to the version on '20 years of' even though that one is mysteriously 7 seconds shorter (and is listed as the Brotherhood album version, which it clearly isn't)

0 likes

Aaron Gerritz wrote: http://richpicks.blogspot.com/

My favorite version of Bizarre Love Triangle is what I believe to be the original 7" version, only available on CD to my knowledge on the Bizarre Love Triangle CD single which also included several other versions of the song along with State of the Nation. Below is full information about the CD:

CD5: US 1994 (Qwest 9 20546-2)

    4:20    Bizarre Love Triangle (album version)
    6:41    Bizarre Love Triangle (extended dance mix)
    7:00    I Don't Care (dub) \*
    6:31    State of the Nation
    3:44    Bizarre Love Triangle (single remix)

Same single that's mentioned earlier in the thread!

0 likes

404 error wrote:

musicoloog wrote:

There's an even better mix of BLT on the "Married to the Mob" soundtrack. It adds an extra vocal melody and ending.

That's Stephen Hague's version... indeed a better mix!

Sounds exactly the same as the '94 version on 'best of' to me, but then the more mixes one hears the more they all become indistinguishable. They also both sound identical to the version on '20 years of' even though that one is mysteriously 7 seconds shorter (and is listed as the Brotherhood album version, which it clearly isn't)

Musically the '94 version is near identical, but the vocals were re-recorded. Again, Married to the Mob still sounds like a better mix since it adds an extra vocal line of Barney singing "doo doo doo.."

0 likes

Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

0 likes

Tokoloshe Man wrote: Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

:wtf: I was hoping for them to get the errors fixed before the JP releases...

:rip:

0 likes

Mr. Disco wrote:

Tokoloshe Man wrote: Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

:wtf: I was hoping for them to get the errors fixed before the JP releases...

:rip:

Hopefully they'll be released later, error-free.

0 likes

Tokoloshe Man wrote: Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

thank goodness, they had sense..

although they could have just released the main albums..

let's see what happens..

later -1

0 likes

surely they're not gonna fix it ???? !

0 likes

-1 wrote:

Tokoloshe Man wrote: Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

thank goodness, they had sense..

although they could have just released the main albums..

The main releases seemingly had issues as well....

(from the glitch thread)

  1. The Him - Glitch at 5:25-5:26 4, 586 ("abrupt ending", "drops the last 4 bass notes" - unconfirmed)
  2. Sunrise 6:01 - Sudden volume drop in right channel at 2:36
0 likes

greeneyes1 wrote:

-1 wrote:

Tokoloshe Man wrote: Warner Japan announcement

Japanese edition ---> Release cancelled.

thank goodness, they had sense..

although they could have just released the main albums..

The main releases seemingly had issues as well....

(from the glitch thread)

  1. The Him - Glitch at 5:25-5:26 4, 586 ("abrupt ending", "drops the last 4 bass notes" - unconfirmed)
  2. Sunrise 6:01 - Sudden volume drop in right channel at 2:36

yeah, i know, but that's easy to fix, unlike the bonus discs..

later -1

0 likes

4, 586 ("abrupt ending", "drops the last 4 bass notes" - unconfirmed)

There's nothing wrong with this on the promo disc.

0 likes

johnny james wrote:

4, 586 ("abrupt ending", "drops the last 4 bass notes" - unconfirmed)

There's nothing wrong with this on the promo disc.

some tracks on the promo discs are ok, when they aren't on the released versions..

and vice versa.... such as 'blue monday' missing beats on the promo, but its ok on the release..

and others have different tracks... like both versions of temptation on the bonus disc for movement.

later -1

0 likes

surely you're all mad - buy the originals for next to nothing on amazon or just 'substance' which has most of these supposedly rare 'b' sides. I don't begrudge the lads a penny, but its a bit like 'the best of new order' - they are not doing anything new so the record co. pumps out a 'new' collection that aint new or good value.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗