Skip to content

Gillian Bernard Steve Phil and Tom Chapman....UPDATED

Archived

99 replies · 11,551 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

'Tis both a shame and a godsend... what else would you expect from this lot. :thumb:

0 likes

I hope hope hope they come to NYC at some point! I am so happy that Gillian will be back on Stage! More live synths! Actually, with Phil and Gillian onstage there will be a LOT of keyboards on the stage, and I am excited about that!

Wish Hooky were there as well, but he made the decision to quit the band so that's his loss, they have the right to continue.

For those of you that would argue that it's not New Order without Hooky....Gillian is just as much an important a part of New Order as Hooky. She brought a LOT to the table with her synth playing and the melodies that she wrote, and that was evident after she left. New Order wasn't all about Hooky's bass for me. When I first heard New Order, it was Bernard's voice, Gillian's synth melodies, and Steve's drumming that grabbed me and made me a fan. Then I noticed Hooky's bass.

Hooky was fantastic live of course, and his bass jamming brought a lot to the table. I am sure Tom Chapman will play Hooky's parts with nothing reverence and respect. Depeche Mode wasn't quite the same after Alan Wilder left, but Wilder's live replacement, Peter Gordeno, never tried to replace Alan onstage, he just played the parts awesomely and with respect. I suspect TC will do the same.

0 likes

Best news ever in a pretty much lousy year! I just hope Hooky sees the light (pun intended...) and re-joins the band!

PS- By the way, any chance of altering the Paris date? I'll be in the City of Light in early October (from the 5th to the the 9th, to be more accurate...)

0 likes

Skullcrushed wrote:

leather_girl wrote:

SHED wrote:

leather_girl wrote: I thought they couldn't use the name or continue under the name New Order any more because of Hooky? Or is this an exception because it's for charity?

See D.Fox comments in TRUTH/RUMOUR:hat:

I know Hooky's not going to be there...just I hope there are no troubles with the rest of them playing these gigs.

There must have been some sort of legal development that led to this happening. I mean it's no secret that when Hooky left Bernard and Steve wanted to continue along with the NO name but were dissuaded by the threat of legal action. Perhaps they have suddenly found some loop hole that allows them to use the name?

Maybe that the whole point of bringing Gillian back in is to make up 3/4 (or 4/5 now) of the band to use the NO legally?

0 likes

Burt Burterson wrote: Someone better wake up Spotnick from his coma.

Agree. The site seems to be a major source for anyone who's interested in New Order. I mean, for an outsider to know what's new is practically impossible now, unless he or she would surf the forums. It comlpetely missed the release of Total on the front page, for example. The label was not amused, I would guess.

0 likes

Hooky's bass parts aren't hard to play but let's face it, no-one can fuck up a synth part with as much charm as Gillian

0 likes

|| | ||| 6217|| 8 || 3 wrote:

Burt Burterson wrote: Someone better wake up Spotnick from his coma.

Agree. The site seems to be a major source for anyone who's interested in New Order. I mean, for an outsider to know what's new is practically impossible now, unless he or she would surf the forums. It comlpetely missed the release of Total on the front page, for example. The label was not amused, I would guess.

I doubt the label gives a monkeys. If they would help fund it, then I'm sure Spotnick would be on the case pretty quick. Perhaps they have a good reason now for a 'donation'?

0 likes

two relatively small venues, if everyone on here turns up, there'll be no locals at all. my mate liz alker did the press release. should know better that it's 'Le Bataclan'... watching City vs Villareal on the Tuesday :(

spare a thought for Yuck, scheduled to play ancienne, the same day.

0 likes

I'll not spare a thought for Yuck, it won't make any difference to them. They will still play their small room as scheduled whilst NO take th emain hall. I doubt many(any) NO fans would be seeing 'Yuck' in any case so no damage done. :)

0 likes

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

cranelane wrote:

johnny james wrote:

leather_girl wrote: I thought they couldn't use the name or continue under the name New Order any more because of Hooky? Or is this an exception because it's for charity?

That is a battle yet to be fought, both sides have been avoiding it so far. I expect this announcement will kick start potential action however.

The fact that they carried on as New Order after Gillian left could have set a precedent,but that was of course in different circumstances,is it a bit premature to be booking flights to Paris I wonder..:confused2:

didn't Steve, Bernard and Hooky work as new order BEFORE Gillian?

Yes but Gillian never seemed to say 'I might sue you if you continue as New Order without me', when she left the band. On the other hand, I think there was a threat to sue from Hooky when Hooky left, if New Order had continued with Steve, Bernard, and Phil. (Of course I think it's a bit unrealistic of Hooky to sue in this case, as it's a few gigs for charity.)

0 likes

leather_girl wrote:

Jeffari-al-Texani wrote:

cranelane wrote:

johnny james wrote:

leather_girl wrote: I thought they couldn't use the name or continue under the name New Order any more because of Hooky? Or is this an exception because it's for charity?

That is a battle yet to be fought, both sides have been avoiding it so far. I expect this announcement will kick start potential action however.

The fact that they carried on as New Order after Gillian left could have set a precedent,but that was of course in different circumstances,is it a bit premature to be booking flights to Paris I wonder..:confused2:

didn't Steve, Bernard and Hooky work as new order BEFORE Gillian?

Yes but Gillian never seemed to say 'I might sue you if you continue as New Order without me', when she left the band/. On the other hand, I think there was a threat to sue from Hooky when Hooky left, if New Order had continued with Steve, Bernard, and Phil. (Of course I think it's a bit unrealistic of Hooky to sue in this case, as it's a few gigs for charity.)

Um... her husband is the drummer in that band so to sue them, is to sue him and all that...

0 likes

Burt Burterson wrote: Someone better wake up Spotnick from his coma.

:evil4:

0 likes

This chubby little Mexican might actually get to yell the oh's in temptation and sing along to ceremony for the first time. Just like the thousands who seem to have taken it for granted.

Great news indeed.

0 likes

cranelane wrote:

Skullcrushed wrote:

Meanwhile Gillian Gilbert had this to say of her return: "It's been a long ten years since I took a break from the band, so I I'm really happy to be back, and this is a great place to start.

Interesting qoute from G.G.

I know!!! :)

0 likes

Burt Burterson wrote: Someone better wake up Spotnick from his coma.

And Tim Jauncey too :love2:

Need to persuade my boss to set me free for these two gigs in October. Oh fook! What shall I say to my wife??? :scratch: :evil4:

0 likes

Don't get your hopes up too high... http://www.spex.de/2011/09/05/musik-news-new-order-live-2011-michael-shamberg/

From the last part of the article:

*UPDATE: »Nicht in Deutschland« müssen wir wohl in »vielleicht bald in Deutschland« umschreiben. Bernard Sumner ließ in Reaktion auf den Artikel erfreulicher Weise verlauten: »We want to see how these gigs go, if they go well then there will be more next year. And playing in Germany is very possible.«

0 likes

leather_girl wrote: Don't get your hopes up too high... http://www.spex.de/2011/09/05/musik-news-new-order-live-2011-michael-shamberg/

From the last part of the article:

*UPDATE: »Nicht in Deutschland« müssen wir wohl in »vielleicht bald in Deutschland« umschreiben. Bernard Sumner ließ in Reaktion auf den Artikel erfreulicher Weise verlauten: »We want to see how these gigs go, if they go well then there will be more next year. And playing in Germany is very possible.«

What? You prompted the exact opposite reaction :nod:

0 likes

leather_girl wrote: Don't get your hopes up too high... http://www.spex.de/2011/09/05/musik-news-new-order-live-2011-michael-shamberg/

From the last part of the article:

*UPDATE: »Nicht in Deutschland« müssen wir wohl in »vielleicht bald in Deutschland« umschreiben. Bernard Sumner ließ in Reaktion auf den Artikel erfreulicher Weise verlauten: »We want to see how these gigs go, if they go well then there will be more next year. And playing in Germany is very possible.«

That's good news indeed! Bernd, Daniel and Norbert, is there a small room in house where I can sleep for a few hours? :sleep:

0 likes

They should be called Ice Cubes or Show Room Dummies indeed. :shrug:

0 likes

Get in there! I've proper missed New Order....didn't realise how much til I saw the news yesterday :nod:

0 likes

Julie wrote: Get in there! I've proper missed New Order....didn't realise how much til I saw the news yesterday :nod:

Hiya Julie, its Mike from Cheshire, will you and Rosie be coming to any of these shows? :)

0 likes

Peter Hook's response via twitter: "It's a shame that, I thought Bad Lieutenant weren't bad!" Read about it Here

0 likes

Big Mouth Julio wrote:

Burt Burterson wrote: Someone better wake up Spotnick from his coma.

And Tim Jauncey too :love2:

Need to persuade my boss to set me free for these two gigs in October. Oh fook! What shall I say to my wife??? :scratch: :evil4:

Do what I do, say you are treating her to a romantic trip to Paris. :evil4:

0 likes

Big Mouth Julio wrote:

leather_girl wrote: Don't get your hopes up too high... http://www.spex.de/2011/09/05/musik-news-new-order-live-2011-michael-shamberg/

From the last part of the article:

*UPDATE: »Nicht in Deutschland« müssen wir wohl in »vielleicht bald in Deutschland« umschreiben. Bernard Sumner ließ in Reaktion auf den Artikel erfreulicher Weise verlauten: »We want to see how these gigs go, if they go well then there will be more next year. And playing in Germany is very possible.«

That's good news indeed! Bernd, Daniel and Norbert, is there a small room in house where I can sleep for a few hours? :sleep:

You're welcome. But you know the gigs are in Bruxelles and Paris, don't you?

0 likes

everyoneverywhere wrote:

GlasVegas wrote: Can I point out that I'm the first person to coin the completely wanky term 'NOv2' right here, today, on these forums. A lazy journalist lurks within me.

Do i win £40?

New Order version 2.0 has been around since 2000 when Gillian left and Phil joined

I would say New Order v3 is be more accurate :nod:

I make it New Order v5 actually, if you think about it.

0 likes

RE/Member wrote: They should get Simon Gallup on bass, haha.

:abovelol: :abovelol: :abovelol: :abovelol: :abovelol: :abovelol: :abovelol: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Of course wiithout Hooky, this fourth incarnation of New Order could always start work on a new album to be titled "Republic Too"

:evil4: :evil4: :evil4: :p :p :p

0 likes

confusion wrote: You're welcome. But you know the gigs are in Bruxelles and Paris, don't you?

"And playing in Germany is very possible." :thumb:

Sorted!

:smoking:

0 likes

This is NEW ORDER as far as I'm concerned. Hooky's a legend, but one member missing out of a foursome doesn't mean they can't still go under that name. Bring it on :D

0 likes

Well i have got a passport and some tickets for Paris.Am i goin to have the bottle to leave Chorley?Doubts even HERE!:nonono:

0 likes

Advice for Tom; stand well out of range of hurtling beer cans and maybe wear a helmet.

Respeck doo.

:thumb:

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗