0_o wrote:
Sounds "awesome" because it is rather prepared by the staff. Chapman, ironically, probably is the most "live" of any of the band members. If you like it to sound like a CD, it sounds good. But you lose improvisation, random mistakes, and a different energy in band personality. Stuart Price has added some good ideas, but not much real live energy except the band having fun. Hooky had become a boorish rock star cliche by the 2005-6 shows, but all you get now is Barney's "special" uncomfortable dancing and neutral singing. Let Chapman have fun, the show needs it.
Sonic quality is part of the A-game that bands and acts have to bring if they play festivals these days. They can't be as punk about it as they used be in the 80s - those days are gone. There are some amazing acts at the UMF this year - Little Dragon, etc., who I've seen live and they are sonically ace in live performances and improvising. But yeah, given that New Order songs are more traditional type, well-known songs (verse/chorus, etc.), it might be hard to improvise out of that on the spot and and retain sonic quality, not like how The Chemical Bros. do running Ableton Live and Logic and synched to massive visuals (There's this fantastic article in Sound on Sound late last year about how the Chemical Bros. improvise and maintain timing in a synched set which any of you technical types might want to check out).
Still, I think New Order can surprise us for some songs, maybe segue/medley more between tracks in interesting ways... now that they are using visuals though, they will need to prepare even more to make that work.
Another great thing about New Order playing festivals is that they can see what other acts have been doing up close, and maybe get fresher ideas too. New music always keeps you young.