simple innit. don't fancy the thread title don't fuckin read it.
tons i've never looked at:
VH1 top 500. VH1
depeche scrote gay crap
new moz album
etc etc etc
Dates
· UTC
These Forums Are Rank Rotten Boring!
Archived236 replies · 3,974 views
This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.
← Back to Behind Closed Doors
Showing posts 151–180 of 237
↑ First post
Latest post ↓
Rather than taking an opinion like Glas's on board, seeing who agrees and bearing it in mind for the future, the standard reaction for this place seems to be to jump all over him and hijack his fecking thread. Nice one.
For my money, this place would be shit without a good dose of talking nonsense and thread-hijacking. But sometimes it gets too much for my taste. If it takes an hour to read through a thread you're interested in, and most of the posts are completely irrelevant, something's wrong.
Perhaps the standard rule should be to look at whether a thread is one which invites opinions on a specific subject. If yes, try to stick to the subject. If no, get on with posting bollocks all over it.
I know I am as guilty as anyone else of breaking that rule, but once a thread's fallen to rat-shit, what's the point in trying to rescue it?
J.A.K wrote: simple innit. don't fancy the thread title don't fuckin read it.
That's a good point. But often you DO fancy the thread, then open it and have to walk through pages of horse shit about Tesco and Engie fcuking Benjy.
Missy Jem's injury thread is a good example of this.
Barney Army wrote:
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote: "I could tell you stories of background MSN action that goes on around here that is really sad."
"Background MSN action"???????
I'm getting too old for this shit.
well mate, it's got something to do with a girl from Serbia and a girl from Switzerland. In particular the girl from Switzerland that sent another flame behind the scenes tonight.
But being a decent chap, I'll protect their identities
And if either wishes to challenge my comments feel free. Do you want the world to know what you've been up to? And why?
For your information Nick, I wasn't picking on one person in particular. I was commenting about the state of BCD in general. I can't speak for other peoples comments though. So whoever you got your 'behind the scenes' information from, got their wires well and truly crossed.
But why am I explaining myself? You won't read it anyway.
Good riddance.
as the Fonz once said on Happy Days:-
BULL (shit) makes the world go round. otherwise we'd all be fuckin zombies
The talkin nonsense bit is all fine and dandy. I'll happily contribute now and again. See my Co-op comments just last week! But as Colin says, don't do it on other people's threads. WE JUST AINT THAT INTERESTED.
Jemma H wrote: *cough*
i preferred Missy Jem. had a certain S & M allure about it. even with the Alfmeister.
who the fucks Jemma H? 
GlasVegas wrote: [
Aint it ironic that pages 3 to 6 of this thread have turned into exactly the type of pish I was talking about in my very first post. Conversations between people that have got nothing to do with thread and which are of no interest to the rest of us. I thought it was a wind up when I read it back this morning but no, they really don’t get it!
The vast majority of the many thousands who visit this board just aint interested in your petty squabbles, laughable attempts at being “flirty” with each other or the fact that you’ve sent each other mail or have no credit in your mobile. If you can’t use Messenger for this then don’t hijack other folk’s threads. Start your own and don’t subject the rest of us to it.
No, its not ironic, those people were yanking your chain! These threads get painful to read because people like you are too fucking lazy to take out all the quotes. You dont talk for anyone but yourself here, not 'the many thousands', okay?
350 and out, bye bye...
Jemma H wrote: I'm just toying with names, bit bored of the Missy.
we want Missy back we want Missy back haha
petition soon
J.A.K wrote:
Jemma H wrote: I'm just toying with names, bit bored of the Missy.
we want Missy back we want Missy back haha
petition soon
I'll change it back just for you 
Oh, it's off topic. INCOMING...!!!!
Missy Jem wrote: Fazackerly
duuhhhh!!
its Fazakerley.
as in Fazakerley County Primary. my old school.
MATE!!!
Missy Jem wrote:
Oh, it's off topic. INCOMING...!!!!
Not at all. The topic of this thread is boring and unwelcome interjections on threads which have been started to discuss a particular topic, n'est pas?
Missy Jem wrote:
J.A.K wrote:
Jemma H wrote: I'm just toying with names, bit bored of the Missy.
we want Missy back we want Missy back haha
petition soon
I'll change it back just for you
Oh, it's off topic. INCOMING...!!!!
petition for Alfie next. we want alfie back we want alfie back
alrightJem?
BIGINOIL wrote:
Missy Jem wrote:
Oh, it's off topic. INCOMING...!!!!
Not at all. The topic of this thread is boring and unwelcome interjections on threads which have been started to discuss a particular topic, n'est pas?
And this is a general discussion board...
This thread has ended up being fucking amusing... Thanks guys! 
Snorri xxx
BIGINOIL wrote:
Missy Jem wrote:
Oh, it's off topic. INCOMING...!!!!
Not at all. The topic of this thread is boring and unwelcome interjections on threads which have been started to discuss a particular topic, n'est pas?
*slaps bat against hand menacingly*
You don't like a thread don't read it... That's what I do...
Sometimes a thread looks interesting and gets hijacked or is too waffley... again I don't bother with those sorts of threads... unless it's something I really want to comment on.
If people don't like the forums full stop... well the internet is a big place... find somewhere else to play!
Ronald Kirsch wrote: GlasVegas' most successful thread yet. seven pages and counting.
I imagine that GlasVegas really doesn't look at starting threads in terms of their "success" or not, in part because you'd have to be really sad to see the the extremely narrow and insignificant world of NOOL in those terms. But then you already knew that. You tedious, snidey cunt.
(The Good Doctor) Martin Fradley wrote:
Ronald Kirsch wrote: GlasVegas' most successful thread yet. seven pages and counting.
I imagine that GlasVegas really doesn't look at starting threads in terms of their "success" or not, in part because you'd have to be really sad to see the the extremely narrow and insignificant world of NOOL in those terms. But then you already knew that. You tedious, snidey cunt.
Damn, is this thread dead now? I've got loads more to say
As I said in my very first post on this thread it could have been a healthy discussion. But then people started forming cliques....again 
Glas, what did you expect? People naturally want to know if you were having a pop at them. Do you expect anyone to let that go?
If someone has got problem with me you can talk to me at a gig, or if you cant do that mail me direct. Despite evidence to the contrary I'm a sensible chap.
But if anyone else wants to call me names on a post save it. It just makes you look bad, and me laugh.
Yes..and Jeremy Beadle was having a wank when he observed his cock to be a bit on the small side,but on the other hand its massive
does the message box on this site not work then? surely people could use that for most of this stuff.
remove the post count & people wouldn't post nearly as much rubbish, they only do it to get their count up, gawd knows why.
Think most of us have been guilty of thread hijacking at some stage and it can get frustrating. Problem is, some of the interjections are quite amusing. But one man's Ricky Gervais is another's Rob Schneider.
One thing that grates me is that occasionally some genuinely interesting threads emerge on BCD, but they're soon drowned in the sea of brainless threads. They disappear down the pecking order into oblivion. Freedom of speech maybe, but the forum agenda often ends up being set by the outspoken few. It's almost a reward for not exercising discretion.
:\pimp3:
hibster wrote: remove the post count & people wouldn't post nearly as much rubbish, they only do it to get their count up, gawd knows why.
now now ....
That's just a complete and utter bollox and surprisingly coming from a person who reached 4,000 in 2 days only
erm, not sure the majority will actually understand but I remember like it was just yesterday
