Free Radical wrote:
I'll cast my vote for Oasis as the most overrated band of all time.
And, to defend Jack's position, I don't consider Pearl Jam overrated--not really a big fan, but its not like they were ever critic's darlings anywhere. Besides, even though I'm not a fan, its impossible to deny PJ's talent. They just have yet to record anything that's really impressed me.
Other overrated bands/performers: the Eagles, Bruce Springsteen, Fiona Apple, Jewell, and Sarah Mclaughlin (the latter three of whom were secretly cloned in a factory in South Korea).
Well, Ten, Vs., and Vitalogy were all huge, huge albums when they came out. Ten sold over 12 million copies in the US. That's pretty huge. Pearl Jam are very successful commercially and reasonably successful critically. Not that I hate them, but they got huge amounts of radio play and video play back here in the mid 1990's, which also turned me off. Yes, they do have have many good critical reviews, though perhaps not quite commensurate with their commercial success. I also recently read a flowing review of them in my Newsweek (among others) a couple of months ago in relation to their new album. I think part of the reason critics do pay them more mind is because they do take strong social stands, which is fine by me.
I prefer the other Seattle bands, to be honest. Most of Pearl Jam's stuff is too slow, though Corduroy is a good tune. Anyway, I never said they suck or anything, just that I don't agree with their huge success.
And yeah, I agree with your other bands listed.