Skip to content

Movement

Archived

44 replies · 866 views

This is an archived legacy thread. Replies are closed, but the discussion is preserved.

Just thought i'd share this with you...

I was in HMV in stockport yesterday doing some serious damage to my pay packet, and they had movement playing! this made my day, and congratulated the attendant on his fine taste.

However, the scallies over in the rap section pretending to be gangsters did not seem to impressed. obviously, this made it all the more sweeter.

0 likes

the first four, although i missed some of truth as i was upstairs buying a manics dvd...

0 likes

I have Movement and the Taras Shevrenko concert playing in my Jag for the last two weeks. Some truly underappreciated songs on that tape. Denial, Chosen Time, ICB...Live I love Denial and Temptation. Makes you think that Barney, Peter and Steve just hung out in the studio jamming in those dark days after Ian's death. Also makes me think that all the early NO gigs were really experiments done for their own amusement and betterment and $$$ rather than to entertain their fans. Nothing more difficult than starting over with a set of all new songs written and sung by those that never wanted to sing, trying to make it on their own. They should have fallen completely on their faces. Please note how horrible Barney's vocals were on Ceremony--almost tone death, he does not even sound like English is his native tongue. Yet he fires it up for Chosen Time and Denial.

0 likes

I remember the sounds of Dreams Never End blaring out of speakers outside a large sports shop near Oxford Circus. My mate and I stood outside singing along and playing air guitar, oblivious to passers by. This happened a couple of years after it's release

0 likes

What a quality thing to hear playing in public. One of NO's top 3 albums. But don't say that too loud. The Technique worshippers might hear you....

0 likes

Technique is a great album. No doubt about it. However, Movement excites me a bit more. It's not that i rate Movement higher than Technique but that transitional period produced some amazing songs. From 81-83/4, NewOrder were peaking creatively in my opinion. Ceremony, EGG, Procession, Temptation, Truth, Chosen Time, Turn the Heater On, Blue Monday...ground breaking and exciting. The later classics (Perfect Kiss, True Faith, Regret) are great songs (perhaps even easier to listen to) but not as innovative as the earlier material. They obviously improved techically by the time they recorded Low-Life but the experimental egde had faded.

current order of albums and EP's:

1)81/82 EP 2)Get Ready (premix tracklisting) LowLife Technique Peel Sessions Power Corruption and Lies Brotherhood Movement

0 likes

Originally posted by Biznotic Love Trapezoid Technique is a great album. No doubt about it. However, Movement excites me a bit more. It's not that i rate Movement higher than Technique but that transitional period produced some amazing songs. From 81-83/4, NewOrder were peaking creatively in my opinion. Ceremony, EGG, Procession, Temptation, Truth, Chosen Time, Turn the Heater On, Blue Monday...ground breaking and exciting. The later classics (Perfect Kiss, True Faith, Regret) are great songs (perhaps even easier to listen to) but not as innovative as the earlier material. They obviously improved techically by the time they recorded Low-Life but the experimental egde had faded. current order of albums and EP's:1)81/82 EP2)Get Ready (premix tracklisting) LowLife Technique Peel Sessions Power Corruption and Lies Brotherhood Movement

I agree. That whole early period produced most of their best stuff, with a few notable exceptions. In my opinion, the more recent the album, the more skippable songs on it (although that isn't always true). My ranking (as of today) of the studio albums alone would have to go:

Movement Low Life PCL Brotherhood Get Ready Technique Republic

0 likes

I've always loved 'Movement' as I thought it was such an atmospheric album and I never understood why so many people hate it.

:beer:

0 likes

I always thought the production on Movement was awful - as if the band were trying to hide the fact they had a new singe : if you burn a CD with the Peel Session versions and Ceremony, IALP on it, it becomes much better.

0 likes

yeah i agree with the point mark made. ive always felt movement to be a pretty grimy yet really listenable debut, its ackwardness is perhaps its selling point to me, thats what makes it interesting, plus there are some badly produced gems on there. it made power corruption and lies possible.

0 likes

I find the only glaring production issue with Movement is with the vocals. Perhaps it is because they could not sing! Techinally the band was at a peak. Steve's drumming is outstanding. Peter and Barney free up their guitars for some near monster jams--kinda a precursor of the "small dicks, big songs" endings that would dominate their future work. Overall, its a moody and dark album with moments of energy and release. They really need to bring some of those songs back into their set.

But then again, when you average 11 songs per gig, its hard to include many older songs.

0 likes

If I thought Movement was New Order's best album, I would not be a fan.

0 likes

movement is great im sick to death of this movement bashing to say your not a new order fan if movement is your fav album is fuking stupid

0 likes

I think the main difference, and this is a generalisation, I know, is that there are two sides:

  1. People who like Movement: and were Joy Division fans, old enough to remember all that and the excitement of Movement being released

  2. People who 'got into' New Order because they quite liked Blue Monday, Technique, True Faith, etc. or are too young to remember the 'good old days' :laugh:

Either way, all opinions are valid and I think you can still be a true fan, whether you bought Movement on the day of release, or you 'discovered' New Order when you first heard 'Get Ready'.

:beer:

0 likes

I never understood why Republic always ends up at the bottom of every list. It's definitely one of my top 5 albums. Anyone care to explain? :scratch:

0 likes

Movement is an essential buy, if only because it marks the transistion from Joy Division to New Order. I think its faults as an album (production quality, Barney not quite comfortable singing, etc) keep it from being GREAT, but it's certainly a good place to start once you've gotten all the JD stuff and want to explore NO.

0 likes

Why is Republic rated so low..... There are some very good and outstanding songs on that album--Regret, Everybody,Everywhere come to mind immediatley. But compared to their other albums, Republic is lacking. I like the first 6 tunes then I start hitting the "next" button until I get to Special or Avalanche. For me it lacks the spark that all the other albums have. And Hooky is missing for much of the album. There is not anything real exciting--no inovations like we heard on PCL, no deep soul searching techno like in Low Life, no acoustic materpieces and techy brillance of Brotherhood, it pales compared to Technique in terms of dancability (although the remixes on the singles can be good) and, what the hell, Get Ready is more of a rocking bastard with more of a NO sound than Republic.

Which brings me to this statement, Republic is the least NO sounding album of all, sounding more like a Electronic album. And that is not saying that it is a bad album, just not good enough to knock the others off their perch.

0 likes

I think the biggest problem with "Movement" is the flat production. Someone said in another thread something like "'Movement' kicks ass. If you don't like it maybe you're not playing it loud enough". After reading this I played the album as loud as I could in my car and – surprise! – it sounded a lot better. It's not a bad album, it just lacks a good production. If Hannett wasn't so high on smack "Movement" could be much better.

0 likes

maybe movement was made to be listened to loud?

0 likes

Originally posted by Ian Pillar movement is greatim sick to death of this movement bashingto say your not a new order fan if movement is your fav album is fuking stupid

But that's not what I wrote, is it. The point I was conveying was Movement isn't my favourite and if I felt it was their best effort, I probably wouldn't still be following them today.

I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. I just tried to imagine for a moment that I preferred it to Unknown Pleasures, Closer, PC&L, Low-Life, Brotherhood and Technique and it just didn't work.

0 likes

Originally posted by Andy > Originally posted by Ian Pillar> movement is great> im sick to death of this movement bashing> to say your not a new order fan if movement is > your fav album is fuking stupid

But that's not what I wrote, is it. The point I was conveying was Movement isn't my favourite and if I felt it was their best effort, I probably wouldn't still be following them today.

I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. I just tried to imagine for a moment that I preferred it to Unknown Pleasures, Closer, PC&L, Low-Life, Brotherhood and Technique and it just didn't work. Correct me if I misunderstand, but it puzzles me a bit why you would list Unknown Pleasures and especially Closer as being such highlights in the band's career, but you say that Movement is not comparable in quality to those albums. Movement seems to me to be much more closely linked, in terms of overall sound, to Joy Division than the later albums you mentioned.

0 likes

Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope > Originally posted by Andy> > > > Originally posted by Ian Pillar> > movement is great> > im sick to death of this movement bashing> > to say your not a new order fan if movement is > > your fav album is fuking stupid>

But that's not what I wrote, is it. The point I was conveying was Movement isn't my favourite and if I felt it was their best effort, I probably wouldn't still be following them today.

I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. I just tried to imagine for a moment that I preferred it to Unknown Pleasures, Closer, PC&L, Low-Life, Brotherhood and Technique and it just didn't work. Correct me if I misunderstand, but it puzzles me a bit why you would list Unknown Pleasures and especially Closer as being such highlights in the band's career, but you say that Movement is not comparable in quality to those albums. Movement seems to me to be much more closely linked, in terms of overall sound, to Joy Division than the later albums you mentioned.

I'm referring to something I favour, not something that merely sounds similar.

Example: There are a lot of bands that have tried to sound like Joy Division but that doesn't mean they've approached their quality.

Do you like Movement more than Closer? Just curious.

0 likes

Originally posted by Andy > Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope> > > > Originally posted by Andy> > > > > > > Originally posted by Ian Pillar> > > movement is great> > > im sick to death of this movement bashing> > > to say your not a new order fan if movement is > > > your fav album is fuking stupid> > >

But that's not what I wrote, is it. The point I was conveying was Movement isn't my favourite and if I felt it was their best effort, I probably wouldn't still be following them today.

I didn't mean to hurt anybody's feelings. I just tried to imagine for a moment that I preferred it to Unknown Pleasures, Closer, PC&L, Low-Life, Brotherhood and Technique and it just didn't work. Correct me if I misunderstand, but it puzzles me a bit why you would list Unknown Pleasures and especially Closer as being such highlights in the band's career, but you say that Movement is not comparable in quality to those albums. Movement seems to me to be much more closely linked, in terms of overall sound, to Joy Division than the later albums you mentioned.

I'm referring to something I favour, not something that merely sounds similar.

Example: There are a lot of bands that have tried to sound like Joy Division but that doesn't mean they've approached their quality.

Do you like Movement more than Closer? Just curious.

Nah, I like Closer better, but I still think that Movement sounds more or less like a logical progression in terms of overall sound. The production of an album really doesn't bother me as much as the actual music itself, and I personally find quite a kinship between the sounds of the Joy Division albums and Movement, so it always makes me a bit suspicious how many New Order fans revere the former but dismiss the latter. I'll admit that the production on Movement is a bit sluggish on a few songs, and that Barney really isn't singing too well (but that isn't really a stretch of the imagination, now is it?)--although Hooky didn't exactly wow me with his vocal prowess either--but the overall songs sound remarkably like Joy Division, which shouldn't surprise anyone since 3/4 remaining members were still there. Sure, Barney isn't as good a singer as Ian was (especially trying to sound like him on that album), and comparatively speaking he sure can't write lyrics, but I think the overall sound of the album is quite good. Only one skippable track (ICB), and that's pretty good, so I don't really see why so many people make it a skippable album. I think it has more value than as a stepping-stone, a conversation piece in the band's progression; I rather find it to be one of the band's most consistant albums (just look at the same Joy Division-influenced sound popping up again and again later on; for example, Sunrise sounds like it could've easily been on Movement). You don't get songs like BLT on Movement, but you sure get a lot of good stuff.

0 likes

you skip ICB? one of my favorites. come on Pope, you gotta be kidding.

it's so far away, it seems to draw me in

0 likes

Originally posted by His Holiness, The Pope (just look at the same Joy Division-influenced sound popping up again and again later on; for example, Sunrise sounds like it could've easily been on Movement).

Eh ? You need your lugs cleaning out !

0 likes

i see what he's saying about Sunrise. I've always though Sunrise was just Procession plus 3 or 4 years. Same basic structure and mood but with 85 technology instead of 81.

0 likes

I've said this before, Movement & PCl (and all singles up to & including 84)epitomise to me what New order are (were). Dont get me wrong I like all their stuff but this period really does it for me. Barneys flattish vocals (emotioneless some people may say) totally complemented the music then which had a sinister eerie feel then...primitive electronics, the pulse like rythms, listen to truth really LOUD and you will see what I mean - try watching Nosferatu with that on. PCL moved on a different axis but had a unique sound and revolutionary and enigmatic spirit..

enuff for now

0 likes

If this was a question of style, then the Movement era wins hands down. Take a look at the old videos and photos (Phillipe Carly:clap:) Much better aesthetically in those days. VOCALS: Overall, Barneys vocals and were at it's best early 82. Riverside, Newcastle, North London Poly, Brussels, Paris et al. They fitted the music perfectly.

0 likes

Originally posted by Solitude If this was a question of style, then the Movement era wins hands down.Take a look at the old videos and photos (Phillipe Carly:clap:)Much better aesthetically in those days.VOCALS: Overall, Barneys vocals and were at it's best early 82. Riverside, Newcastle, North London Poly, Brussels, Paris et al. They fitted the music perfectly.

I agree that the image in the early days was better, but you have to give respect to the late Eighties-era hits that made them more than just a blip on the radar. Blue Monday started it, to be sure, but BLT and True Faith opened the door to a brief flirtation with "rock god" status. Not everything NO did in the '85-90 period is top-notch (Shellshock?) but that was a good time musically for them, they really expanded the airwaves.

0 likes

You're leaving NewOrderOnline

This link goes to an external website we don't operate, which has its own privacy policy and terms.

Destination:
Continue ↗